The case for a fresh mandate: clear, respectful arguments on mandate, tax, NHS waits, borders, energy, and Digital ID — plus copy-paste text for your own letter. No data stored.
Sign the petition for a fresh mandate — and send a personal letter that can’t be dismissed as automated.
There was a time when the pace of public life felt slower, less litigated, less performative. The evening news happened
Tired of misinformation and emotionally charged slogans drowning out the facts? This no-nonsense Q&A tackles the most common myths surrounding the Israel-Gaza conflict with clear, evidence-based answers — covering history, occupation claims, genocide accusations, and more.
This blog explores the Israel-Hamas war with clarity and historical context, cutting through misinformation. From the October 7 attacks to Hamas’s tactics and international law, we examine the facts behind the headlines — and why outrage without understanding won’t lead to peace.
A British Court of Human Rights would protect fundamental freedoms while ensuring democratic accountability, legal consistency, and national sovereignty—upholding rights within a UK-based framework rather than relying on unelected foreign judges.
💡 New on No Bull Politics:
Is Net Zero dogma driving Britain into energy poverty?
Here’s a bold, practical plan to regain control, cut prices, and fund our own future — with British energy for British needs.
👉 Read the report: [link]
#EnergyIndependence #NetZero #UKPolitics #NoBull
A British Court of Human Rights would protect fundamental freedoms while ensuring democratic accountability, legal consistency, and national sovereignty—upholding rights within a UK-based framework rather than relying on unelected foreign judges.
The EU began as a promising trade bloc but morphed into a power-hungry bureaucracy that eroded national sovereignty. While the UK’s decision to leave was right, political betrayal undermined Brexit. Now, we must stay vigilant against both EU overreach and a political class willing to ignore the people’s voice.
The Chancellor’s proposal to tax employer pension contributions could severely reduce future retirement savings, amplifying the impact through the loss of compounding growth. In 10 to 20 years, this may result in poorer pensioners and a greater burden on the state for social care and support—trading short-term fiscal gains for long-term social costs.
