A Jewish MP was barred from speaking at a school. A teaching union celebrated it. And on national radio, a journalist argued there was “nothing wrong” with excluding elected representatives based on political affiliation. This report examines how selective history and moral absolutism are being used to justify democratic exclusion – and why it should alarm everyone.
X has suspended my account without warning and without the chance to appeal. I have contacted X US, X UK, and the Free Speech Union to get answers. Full statement below.
The case for a fresh mandate: clear, respectful arguments on mandate, tax, NHS waits, borders, energy, and Digital ID — plus copy-paste text for your own letter. No data stored.
Sign the petition for a fresh mandate — and send a personal letter that can’t be dismissed as automated.
There was a time when the pace of public life felt slower, less litigated, less performative. The evening news happened
Tired of misinformation and emotionally charged slogans drowning out the facts? This no-nonsense Q&A tackles the most common myths surrounding the Israel-Gaza conflict with clear, evidence-based answers — covering history, occupation claims, genocide accusations, and more.
This blog explores the Israel-Hamas war with clarity and historical context, cutting through misinformation. From the October 7 attacks to Hamas’s tactics and international law, we examine the facts behind the headlines — and why outrage without understanding won’t lead to peace.
A British Court of Human Rights would protect fundamental freedoms while ensuring democratic accountability, legal consistency, and national sovereignty—upholding rights within a UK-based framework rather than relying on unelected foreign judges.
💡 New on No Bull Politics:
Is Net Zero dogma driving Britain into energy poverty?
Here’s a bold, practical plan to regain control, cut prices, and fund our own future — with British energy for British needs.
👉 Read the report: [link]
#EnergyIndependence #NetZero #UKPolitics #NoBull
A British Court of Human Rights would protect fundamental freedoms while ensuring democratic accountability, legal consistency, and national sovereignty—upholding rights within a UK-based framework rather than relying on unelected foreign judges.
