The case for a fresh mandate: clear, respectful arguments on mandate, tax, NHS waits, borders, energy, and Digital ID — plus copy-paste text for your own letter. No data stored.
Sign the petition for a fresh mandate — and send a personal letter that can’t be dismissed as automated.
I am firmly opposed to the introduction of a compulsory digital ID scheme for all British citizens (sometimes called “BritCard”)
There was a time when the pace of public life felt slower, less litigated, less performative. The evening news happened
A British Court of Human Rights would protect fundamental freedoms while ensuring democratic accountability, legal consistency, and national sovereignty—upholding rights within a UK-based framework rather than relying on unelected foreign judges.
Much of what’s wrong in Britain today didn’t begin in 2010. From mass immigration without infrastructure to the ideological overreach of the Equality Act, this post explores the long-term roots of national decline — many of which lie in New Labour’s legacy, not just 14 years of Conservative rule.
Germany’s political firewall aims to protect democracy by isolating parties deemed extreme, particularly the AfD. But does excluding an elected party uphold democratic values—or undermine them? This article explores the origins, impact, and contradictions of Germany’s firewall strategy, questioning whether it truly safeguards democracy or limits political choice.
This Codified British Constitution affirms the sovereignty of the UK, the accountability of its government, and the rights of its people. It establishes clear democratic principles, safeguards national identity, and enhances transparency. With public referenda on major policies and strict financial oversight, it ensures a stable and responsible government for future generations.
A British Court of Human Rights would protect fundamental freedoms while ensuring democratic accountability, legal consistency, and national sovereignty—upholding rights within a UK-based framework rather than relying on unelected foreign judges.
The idea that Britain must pay reparations is based on a selective, one-sided view of history. We don’t owe the world anything—if anything, the world owes us.
