💡 New on No Bull Politics:
Is Net Zero dogma driving Britain into energy poverty?
Here’s a bold, practical plan to regain control, cut prices, and fund our own future — with British energy for British needs.
👉 Read the report: [link]
#EnergyIndependence #NetZero #UKPolitics #NoBull
Germany’s political firewall aims to protect democracy by isolating parties deemed extreme, particularly the AfD. But does excluding an elected party uphold democratic values—or undermine them? This article explores the origins, impact, and contradictions of Germany’s firewall strategy, questioning whether it truly safeguards democracy or limits political choice.
This Codified British Constitution affirms the sovereignty of the UK, the accountability of its government, and the rights of its people. It establishes clear democratic principles, safeguards national identity, and enhances transparency. With public referenda on major policies and strict financial oversight, it ensures a stable and responsible government for future generations.
A British Court of Human Rights would protect fundamental freedoms while ensuring democratic accountability, legal consistency, and national sovereignty—upholding rights within a UK-based framework rather than relying on unelected foreign judges.
The idea that Britain must pay reparations is based on a selective, one-sided view of history. We don’t owe the world anything—if anything, the world owes us.
The 2016 EU Referendum was a legitimate democratic decision, despite claims that a 2% swing could have changed the result. Close margins don’t invalidate elections, misinformation cuts both ways, and democracy doesn’t require a landslide. If small margins disqualify results, many past elections—including devolution votes—would also be in question.
The EU began as a promising trade bloc but morphed into a power-hungry bureaucracy that eroded national sovereignty. While the UK’s decision to leave was right, political betrayal undermined Brexit. Now, we must stay vigilant against both EU overreach and a political class willing to ignore the people’s voice.
The Equality Act 2010 seeks to protect against discrimination, but does it go too far in shielding religion from critique? This article examines whether the Act inadvertently stifles free speech, creates imbalances in preserving cultural heritage, and calls for clarity to better balance individual rights with societal values.
Acts of vandalism against places of worship are reprehensible and counterproductive, imposing unfair costs on victims. While Britain’s Christian majority has the right to oppose the spread of other religions, this must be done lawfully and respectfully, upholding Christian principles of tolerance and love while preserving the nation’s cultural and spiritual heritage.
Last Updated: January 27, 2025. The argument that “British culture is British history, and British history is born on the
