A Jewish MP was barred from speaking at a school. A teaching union celebrated it. And on national radio, a journalist argued there was “nothing wrong” with excluding elected representatives based on political affiliation. This report examines how selective history and moral absolutism are being used to justify democratic exclusion – and why it should alarm everyone.
A French court has ruled that Gazans can apply for asylum — a decision that blends compassion with controversy. While the humanitarian instinct is noble, the risks of importing radical ideologies shaped by Hamas rule cannot be ignored. Europe must act wisely, balancing moral duty with national and regional security.
Tired of misinformation and emotionally charged slogans drowning out the facts? This no-nonsense Q&A tackles the most common myths surrounding the Israel-Gaza conflict with clear, evidence-based answers — covering history, occupation claims, genocide accusations, and more.
This blog explores the Israel-Hamas war with clarity and historical context, cutting through misinformation. From the October 7 attacks to Hamas’s tactics and international law, we examine the facts behind the headlines — and why outrage without understanding won’t lead to peace.
The last time Britain was the instigator of aggression in a conflict was in 1896.
While immigration can enrich a society culturally and economically, large-scale immigration poses significant risks to social integration and cohesion.
Natasha Hausdorff discusses “lawfare,” alleging biased legal actions targeting Israel, emphasizing the need for fair and balanced critique.
