No Appeal. No Warning. No Bull Politics Suspended from X
X has suspended my account without warning and without the chance to appeal. I have contacted X US, X UK, and the Free Speech Union to get answers. Full statement below.
X has suspended my account without warning and without the chance to appeal. I have contacted X US, X UK, and the Free Speech Union to get answers. Full statement below.
A tongue-in-cheek “Patriots’ Cabinet” and 100-day plan: borders made credible, energy made affordable, NHS backlogs blitzed, planning and red tape reset, and free-speech protected. It’s a thought experiment and a provocation—what might a delivery-first government look like if we stopped playing to the SW1 gallery? Plus quick résumés for each minister and a punchy scorecard so readers can judge the results.
A British Court of Human Rights would protect fundamental freedoms while ensuring democratic accountability, legal consistency, and national sovereignty—upholding rights within a UK-based framework rather than relying on unelected foreign judges.
Much of what’s wrong in Britain today didn’t begin in 2010. From mass immigration without infrastructure to the ideological overreach of the Equality Act, this post explores the long-term roots of national decline — many of which lie in New Labour’s legacy, not just 14 years of Conservative rule.
The Equality Act 2010 seeks to protect against discrimination, but does it go too far in shielding religion from critique? This article examines whether the Act inadvertently stifles free speech, creates imbalances in preserving cultural heritage, and calls for clarity to better balance individual rights with societal values.
Acts of vandalism against places of worship are reprehensible and counterproductive, imposing unfair costs on victims. While Britain’s Christian majority has the right to oppose the spread of other religions, this must be done lawfully and respectfully, upholding Christian principles of tolerance and love while preserving the nation’s cultural and spiritual heritage.
The Internet, born to democratize knowledge and foster free speech, faces mounting censorship threats. From attempts to cancel YouTube creators to real-world suppression like the Oxford Union controversy, the battle for open dialogue continues. Suppression drives dissent underground, but the unstoppable Internet champions free expression, echoing Tim Berners-Lee’s vision.
Comparing Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-Four” with current UK government policies reveals concerns about surveillance, media control, language restrictions, propaganda, and protest limitations. Recent legislation and actions, like the Investigatory Powers Act and restrictions on protests, highlight potential threats to free speech and civil liberties reminiscent of Orwell’s dystopia.
Carl Benjamin, known as Sargon of Akkad, is a British YouTuber and political commentator known for his libertarian views and controversial statements.
A “Social Credit System” prioritizing victimhood isn’t established, but debates exist on the role of victimhood in social recognition.