A Jewish MP was barred from speaking at a school. A teaching union celebrated it. And on national radio, a journalist argued there was “nothing wrong” with excluding elected representatives based on political affiliation. This report examines how selective history and moral absolutism are being used to justify democratic exclusion – and why it should alarm everyone.
The UK’s Online Safety Act is far more intrusive than most people realise. It treats private cloud backups as if they were public social media posts and paves the way for client-side scanning — technology that inspects your personal files on your own devices before they’re encrypted. This is a fundamental shift in how the state views privacy, and it demands public scrutiny.
When Gareth Davies warned Labour was taking Britain “back to the 1970s,” critics scoffed. But history tells a harder truth. The 70s weren’t fair or prosperous — they were the decade Britain hit rock bottom. Thatcher rescued it; weak leaders since have let it slip again. Reform UK’s challenge is to rebuild belief — not in nostalgia, but in Britain.
A real-world demonstration of AI’s analytical power: ChatGPT designed the research framework and Grok gathered live sentiment data from X to analyse public opinion on Reform UK. The result reveals what people are really saying — faster and more accurately than manual research ever could.
Lots of politicians argue that Britain should copy Europe’s digital ID systems. But our history and legal culture are very different. In the UK, freedom comes first unless prohibited; in civil law countries, rights are codified by the state. That’s why mandatory ID feels alien here.
I am firmly opposed to the introduction of a compulsory digital ID scheme for all British citizens (sometimes called “BritCard”)
There was a time when the pace of public life felt slower, less litigated, less performative. The evening news happened
A tongue-in-cheek “Patriots’ Cabinet” and 100-day plan: borders made credible, energy made affordable, NHS backlogs blitzed, planning and red tape reset, and free-speech protected. It’s a thought experiment and a provocation—what might a delivery-first government look like if we stopped playing to the SW1 gallery? Plus quick résumés for each minister and a punchy scorecard so readers can judge the results.
A French court has ruled that Gazans can apply for asylum — a decision that blends compassion with controversy. While the humanitarian instinct is noble, the risks of importing radical ideologies shaped by Hamas rule cannot be ignored. Europe must act wisely, balancing moral duty with national and regional security.
Tired of misinformation and emotionally charged slogans drowning out the facts? This no-nonsense Q&A tackles the most common myths surrounding the Israel-Gaza conflict with clear, evidence-based answers — covering history, occupation claims, genocide accusations, and more.
