Argument against compulsory “BritCard” / Digital ID for all citizens
I am firmly opposed to the introduction of a compulsory digital ID scheme for all British citizens (sometimes called “BritCard”)
I am firmly opposed to the introduction of a compulsory digital ID scheme for all British citizens (sometimes called “BritCard”)
Tired of misinformation and emotionally charged slogans drowning out the facts? This no-nonsense Q&A tackles the most common myths surrounding the Israel-Gaza conflict with clear, evidence-based answers — covering history, occupation claims, genocide accusations, and more.
Much of what’s wrong in Britain today didn’t begin in 2010. From mass immigration without infrastructure to the ideological overreach of the Equality Act, this post explores the long-term roots of national decline — many of which lie in New Labour’s legacy, not just 14 years of Conservative rule.
This article challenges the simplistic claim that asylum seekers receive “nothing” and proposes a rational, humane, and secure vetting system. It explores the public support provided, outlines flaws in current assumptions, and sets out how to protect both compassion and national integrity through common sense reforms.
Germany’s political firewall aims to protect democracy by isolating parties deemed extreme, particularly the AfD. But does excluding an elected party uphold democratic values—or undermine them? This article explores the origins, impact, and contradictions of Germany’s firewall strategy, questioning whether it truly safeguards democracy or limits political choice.
Scapegoating migrants echoes the dangerous rhetoric of 1930s Germany, fostering division and dehumanization. Immigration requires thoughtful balance, not blame. Let’s focus on compassion and practical solutions, resisting dog-whistling politics that exploit fear. History teaches us the cost of hatred—let’s not repeat it. Debate must build bridges, not burn them.
If the UK or an independent Scotland were to apply to re-join the EU, several conditions and requirements would likely be imposed. These would be based on the EU’s standard accession criteria, known as the Copenhagen criteria, and additional specific considerations arising from the UK’s previous membership and its exit process.
The UK government could have pursued stricter immigration, regulatory divergence, exclusive fishing rights, independent foreign policy, and aggressive global trade agreements.
While immigration can enrich a society culturally and economically, large-scale immigration poses significant risks to social integration and cohesion.
During the Brexit campaign, proponents argued that leaving the EU would bring immediate benefits. Some of the claims made included: