Argument against compulsory “BritCard” / Digital ID for all citizens
I am firmly opposed to the introduction of a compulsory digital ID scheme for all British citizens (sometimes called “BritCard”)
I am firmly opposed to the introduction of a compulsory digital ID scheme for all British citizens (sometimes called “BritCard”)
A British Court of Human Rights would protect fundamental freedoms while ensuring democratic accountability, legal consistency, and national sovereignty—upholding rights within a UK-based framework rather than relying on unelected foreign judges.
This Codified British Constitution affirms the sovereignty of the UK, the accountability of its government, and the rights of its people. It establishes clear democratic principles, safeguards national identity, and enhances transparency. With public referenda on major policies and strict financial oversight, it ensures a stable and responsible government for future generations.
A British Court of Human Rights would protect fundamental freedoms while ensuring democratic accountability, legal consistency, and national sovereignty—upholding rights within a UK-based framework rather than relying on unelected foreign judges.
The EU began as a promising trade bloc but morphed into a power-hungry bureaucracy that eroded national sovereignty. While the UK’s decision to leave was right, political betrayal undermined Brexit. Now, we must stay vigilant against both EU overreach and a political class willing to ignore the people’s voice.
Last Updated: January 27, 2025. The argument that “British culture is British history, and British history is born on the
The risk of Incremental Expansion of Competences, or “competence creep,” is one of the most significant concerns for EU critics.
Scapegoating migrants echoes the dangerous rhetoric of 1930s Germany, fostering division and dehumanization. Immigration requires thoughtful balance, not blame. Let’s focus on compassion and practical solutions, resisting dog-whistling politics that exploit fear. History teaches us the cost of hatred—let’s not repeat it. Debate must build bridges, not burn them.
The article linked below cam to my attention via a post on X (formerly Twitter) and a few things just didn’t read true.
The politicisation of the police and courts undermines impartial justice, erodes public trust, and threatens democracy by enabling abuses of power, weakening the rule of law, and compromising civil liberties. Safeguarding independence is essential.