A British Court of Human Rights would protect fundamental freedoms while ensuring democratic accountability, legal consistency, and national sovereignty—upholding rights within a UK-based framework rather than relying on unelected foreign judges.
The 2016 EU Referendum was a legitimate democratic decision, despite claims that a 2% swing could have changed the result. Close margins don’t invalidate elections, misinformation cuts both ways, and democracy doesn’t require a landslide. If small margins disqualify results, many past elections—including devolution votes—would also be in question.
The Equality Act 2010 seeks to protect against discrimination, but does it go too far in shielding religion from critique? This article examines whether the Act inadvertently stifles free speech, creates imbalances in preserving cultural heritage, and calls for clarity to better balance individual rights with societal values.
Acts of vandalism against places of worship are reprehensible and counterproductive, imposing unfair costs on victims. While Britain’s Christian majority has the right to oppose the spread of other religions, this must be done lawfully and respectfully, upholding Christian principles of tolerance and love while preserving the nation’s cultural and spiritual heritage.
The article linked below cam to my attention via a post on X (formerly Twitter) and a few things just didn’t read true.
The politicisation of the police and courts undermines impartial justice, erodes public trust, and threatens democracy by enabling abuses of power, weakening the rule of law, and compromising civil liberties. Safeguarding independence is essential.
Common Law and Civil Law. The United Kingdom primarily follows the Common Law system, while France adheres to the Civil Law system. Here’s a more detailed exploration of the differences.
