Lots of politicians argue that Britain should copy Europe’s digital ID systems. But our history and legal culture are very different. In the UK, freedom comes first unless prohibited; in civil law countries, rights are codified by the state. That’s why mandatory ID feels alien here.
I am firmly opposed to the introduction of a compulsory digital ID scheme for all British citizens (sometimes called “BritCard”)
There was a time when the pace of public life felt slower, less litigated, less performative. The evening news happened
Tired of misinformation and emotionally charged slogans drowning out the facts? This no-nonsense Q&A tackles the most common myths surrounding the Israel-Gaza conflict with clear, evidence-based answers — covering history, occupation claims, genocide accusations, and more.
This blog explores the Israel-Hamas war with clarity and historical context, cutting through misinformation. From the October 7 attacks to Hamas’s tactics and international law, we examine the facts behind the headlines — and why outrage without understanding won’t lead to peace.
A British Court of Human Rights would protect fundamental freedoms while ensuring democratic accountability, legal consistency, and national sovereignty—upholding rights within a UK-based framework rather than relying on unelected foreign judges.
This article challenges the simplistic claim that asylum seekers receive “nothing” and proposes a rational, humane, and secure vetting system. It explores the public support provided, outlines flaws in current assumptions, and sets out how to protect both compassion and national integrity through common sense reforms.
The UK has handed the Chagos Islands to Mauritius in a controversial deal costing taxpayers £101 million a year. This post examines the history, legal background, alternative options, and the strategic risks now facing the UK. Was this a bold diplomatic reset — or a costly and unnecessary surrender?
This Codified British Constitution affirms the sovereignty of the UK, the accountability of its government, and the rights of its people. It establishes clear democratic principles, safeguards national identity, and enhances transparency. With public referenda on major policies and strict financial oversight, it ensures a stable and responsible government for future generations.
A British Court of Human Rights would protect fundamental freedoms while ensuring democratic accountability, legal consistency, and national sovereignty—upholding rights within a UK-based framework rather than relying on unelected foreign judges.
