The EU began as a promising trade bloc but morphed into a power-hungry bureaucracy that eroded national sovereignty. While the UK’s decision to leave was right, political betrayal undermined Brexit. Now, we must stay vigilant against both EU overreach and a political class willing to ignore the people’s voice.
the Data (Use and Access) Bill represents a significant step toward modernizing the UK’s data infrastructure. Its successful implementation will depend on addressing privacy concerns, ensuring inclusivity, and providing clear guidance to stakeholders throughout the transition period.
The risk of Incremental Expansion of Competences, or “competence creep,” is one of the most significant concerns for EU critics.
The Internet, born to democratize knowledge and foster free speech, faces mounting censorship threats. From attempts to cancel YouTube creators to real-world suppression like the Oxford Union controversy, the battle for open dialogue continues. Suppression drives dissent underground, but the unstoppable Internet champions free expression, echoing Tim Berners-Lee’s vision.
The politicisation of the police and courts undermines impartial justice, erodes public trust, and threatens democracy by enabling abuses of power, weakening the rule of law, and compromising civil liberties. Safeguarding independence is essential.
Comparing Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-Four” with current UK government policies reveals concerns about surveillance, media control, language restrictions, propaganda, and protest limitations. Recent legislation and actions, like the Investigatory Powers Act and restrictions on protests, highlight potential threats to free speech and civil liberties reminiscent of Orwell’s dystopia.
In the UK, there is no legal requirement for political parties to have internal democratic leader selection processes.
