A Jewish MP was barred from speaking at a school. A teaching union celebrated it. And on national radio, a journalist argued there was “nothing wrong” with excluding elected representatives based on political affiliation. This report examines how selective history and moral absolutism are being used to justify democratic exclusion – and why it should alarm everyone.
The UK’s Online Safety Act is far more intrusive than most people realise. It treats private cloud backups as if they were public social media posts and paves the way for client-side scanning — technology that inspects your personal files on your own devices before they’re encrypted. This is a fundamental shift in how the state views privacy, and it demands public scrutiny.
The case for a fresh mandate: clear, respectful arguments on mandate, tax, NHS waits, borders, energy, and Digital ID — plus copy-paste text for your own letter. No data stored.
Sign the petition for a fresh mandate — and send a personal letter that can’t be dismissed as automated.
A leaked Afghan migration plan, rising net migration, and a demographic tipping point — is Britain past the point of no return? This post examines the numbers, the cultural consequences, and why it’s not too late to act. But only if we find the courage to speak up — peacefully, but firmly.
A British Court of Human Rights would protect fundamental freedoms while ensuring democratic accountability, legal consistency, and national sovereignty—upholding rights within a UK-based framework rather than relying on unelected foreign judges.
Germany’s political firewall aims to protect democracy by isolating parties deemed extreme, particularly the AfD. But does excluding an elected party uphold democratic values—or undermine them? This article explores the origins, impact, and contradictions of Germany’s firewall strategy, questioning whether it truly safeguards democracy or limits political choice.
This Codified British Constitution affirms the sovereignty of the UK, the accountability of its government, and the rights of its people. It establishes clear democratic principles, safeguards national identity, and enhances transparency. With public referenda on major policies and strict financial oversight, it ensures a stable and responsible government for future generations.
A British Court of Human Rights would protect fundamental freedoms while ensuring democratic accountability, legal consistency, and national sovereignty—upholding rights within a UK-based framework rather than relying on unelected foreign judges.
The 2016 EU Referendum was a legitimate democratic decision, despite claims that a 2% swing could have changed the result. Close margins don’t invalidate elections, misinformation cuts both ways, and democracy doesn’t require a landslide. If small margins disqualify results, many past elections—including devolution votes—would also be in question.
